Compared with other tools

*I'm already set to buy your app asap in a day or two*, as I have tested it before, atleast it is way faster than LrC and cheaper than excire etc, which not every common man or daily user like students and professionals need, other than photographer;

Before buying, after testing the trial.

Tenho encontrado coisas engraçadas como o seu caso, de developers que fazem o essencial, percebem de fotografia, endereçam 95% do que se precisa, muito bem feito, sem o lastro, o custo e a penalidade na performance que as grandes plataformas têm.

English translation (ours, not the customer's words): I've been finding nice things like your case: developers who do the essential, understand photography, cover 95% of what you need, very well made, without the baggage, cost and performance penalty of the big platforms.

Answering the developer's question: how did you find FolioSort?

FolioSort does most of that for me. Of course it isn't perfect, but it's as good as I've seen, and it's a huge step up for what I need.

Comparing FolioSort with what he used before.

I also find the app much easier to use. It's the mix of AI and a better interface that won me over.

Comparing FolioSort with what he used before.

I've already used FolioSort about three times today, whereas I'd reluctantly use digiKam a couple of times a week before.

Comparing FolioSort with digiKam, which he used before.

On a very positive note, I find FolioSort noticeably faster than the other solutions I've been using, especially when browsing my large photo library.

Feedback on a new version.

In my experience, it already feels faster and more responsive than ACDSee and Peakto when browsing large photo collections.

Beta report on 547,000 files across 6 folders.

I like the cleanup tools and still have to work through them and what they offer that Excire doesn't.

Before buying; he also uses Excire.